Politicians and businessmen are friends in the developing world! At least for climate change

When James Smith Chairman Shell UK asked developed Nations to back off the industrialisation drive in developing countries, I sighed for President Museveni who has been attempting to cut down forests for industry. 

But for the first time, I saw politicians and businessmen become bed fellows courtesy of climate change.  This time, it was not hustling over exploitative prices by businessmen against the electorate or politicians reviewing tax policy tantamount to ‘discouraging’ investment.  

No. Chogm in Kampala was the opportune time and place for ‘good’ but aggressive if not ‘selfish’ businessmen to ask the developed world not to tell the developing world what to do as far as reducing carbon emissions is concerned.  For heavens sake they don’t have to buy carbon credits here too! 

In other words do not tell the developing world to set targets for reducing carbon emissions, because you- the developed world are to a greater extent responsible for the world’s climate changing.  Second because the developing world has a right to industrialise too, which means it would need more energy to run machines and ensure air condition as it continues to suffer a warmer world now, thanks to greenhouse gas emissions over the past decades in the developed world. 

What struck me though, is that all business persons who publicly aired their views at the commonwealth business forum and argued from all possible angles in this line, run businesses that emit greenhouse gasses in significant amounts and are on an expansion drive in emerging markets in Asia and Africa.   

Shell for instance, Smith used his time at the podium to announce what his Company is doing to filter bad gases through new technologies and remind the developed world that it is because of their industrialisation era, that there is too much gas in the atmosphere today.  But he is also looking for money this side of the world, signing up new partners, positioning products to suit customers down here and working against all odds to create a love mark of Shell in the developing world. 

President Museveni of course nods, knowing that people now ‘understand’ that the developing world should not continue with environment protection while still leaving in a backward economy.  These days, when ever a new factory opens, there is always a story to write home about and the politician who officially opens it, often makes the News.   

I still do not know why this part of the Chogm final communiqué on climate change missed, given that a voice of 53-in-1 at Bali would definitely be heard.  Or was there a mutual compromise to warrant flat rhetoric of concepts that would inform commonwealth members’ position on climate change at subsequent more decisive summits like the post-kyoto talks in Bali, Indonesia. 

Could it be that Canada stuck to its position that no targets for reducing carbon emissions for some countries alone should be set, while other partners in the ‘crime’ like china and India remain exonerated.  Because, besides setting targets for emissions for developed countries, small states wanted the former to commit funds to help the later adapt to the effects of climate change and work mitigation measures too. 

What ever policy succeeds the Kyoto Protocol- it is still unpredictable… 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: